The myriad of typos over the years one can laugh at – after all who doesn’t suffer from fat thumb from time to time.
However, errors of fact are a different matter.
In both its print and online version of the newspaper The Daily Examiner asserted this on 24 February 2015:
![]() |
[my bolding] |
This is sloppy reporting at best and at worst a deliberate distortion of fact. Quite frankly I’m hoping is was some off-site subbing which caused this blunder.
It was only two days before that The Daily Telegraph, not known to favour Labor, reported:
The indexation change was announced in the May budget. Welfare groups and Labor argue it will cut pensions by $80 a week within 10 years. According to the Parliamentary Budget Office, this amounts to a $23 billion cut to the cost of the age pension by 2023. [my red bolding]
A leading seniors advocate COTA Australia issued a media release on 21 August 2014 which stated:
“If only the CPI had been used since 2009 the Pension would already be $30 per week or $1,560 per year less, and that gap grows to over $80 per week / $4,160 per year in 10 years, and keeps growing. That’s a huge amount for Pensioners who already often have to make choices between heating, decent food, medications and a basic gift for their grandchild’s birthday. “This measure is extremely harsh and goes beyond even that which was recommended by the Commission of Audit….” [my red bolding]
On 22 May 2014 The Guardian reported:
The report, A Budget that Divides a Nation, says pensioners on aged and disability support payments would lose about $80 a week by 2024 after having their payments indexed to CPI. [my red bolding]
The Daily Examiner is telling its readers that pensioners will only lose $8 dollars a year when in fact the change in indexation reduces the value of the aged pension by an est. $416 in 2017 when the change come into effect and, this increases to an est. $4,160 per year by 2025.
Không có nhận xét nào:
Đăng nhận xét